One-Punch Man Season 3 is now one of the most talked-about anime projects of 2025, though not purely due to the right reasons. The franchise is currently at the center of attention due to controversies that surround it, formerly being hailed as a revolutionary animation and a stinging parody of the superhero genre. As production is managed by Bandai Namco Filmworks, long-time viewers have expressed displeasure with the quality and pace of the recent season, thus creating a viral feeling that Bandai Namco is the primary villain in One-Punch Man Season 3.The criticism is based on the common perception that the administration of the project by Bandai Namco has caused a loss of visual consistency and a disjointed narrative. Essentially, Bandai Namco has been extensively criticized as the primary villain of One-Punch Man Season 3, as fans blame the company for the poor performance of the show and its apparent emphasis on commercial success over artistic richness. The anime has a history of a fantastic first season by Madhouse and the second installment by J.C. Staff, whose animation and pacing have been lackluster. The third season has failed to impress the audience with its quality and timing.Saitama (Image Credits: J.C.Staff)One-Punch Man Season 3 was released in October 2025 as a continuation of Saitama and the Monster Association arc, the long-awaited one. Yet, instead of an epic successor to the saga, it turned into a cauldron of frustration. Soon, viewers pointed out the problems of rigid fighting sequences, unevenly paced frames, and overly static imagery, which caused massive discontent. Critics have also said that the source material is good, but the adaptation has an imbalance in production choices that dilutes the impact of some crucial moments."Watching "ONE PUNCH MAN SEASON 3," I feel like it could have been made with sufficient quality, but "Bandai Namco" messed it up." read a tweet.The scandal was worsened when it was established that One-Punch Man Season 3 was being produced directly by Bandai Namco Filmworks. Contrary to the past, where animation firms assumed creative control, this season has witnessed Bandai Namco taking on more corporate involvement in terms of scheduling and directing. According to the fans and analysts, this change has impacted the quality of the show because the tight production schedules and the focus on high merchandise sales seem to override artistic freedom. According to several reports in the industry, some of the production was outsourced, which resulted in obvious discrepancies within episodes."Bandai Namco really turned One Punch Man Season 3 into a masterclass on how to waste a masterpiece. Fans waited years for this? The art, pacing, and energy—gone. You had one punch, and you missed." a fan tweeted.One Punch Man Season 3 – Quality, Studio Shift, and Studio Chain of ResponsibilityOne-Punch Man Season 3, under director Shinpei Nagai, still follows the same plot pattern of increasing conflict between monsters and heroes, yet the visual execution was the most debated issue. The initial parts had a significantly lower motion density, leading to the absence of dynamic fight scenes as the fans expected. Even the director himself admitted to some pressures in the production sphere, asserting that it is difficult to balance the needs of the audience with those of the corporation.Bang, Genos, Saitama, King, and Fubuki (Image Credits: J.C.Staff)Although the motive of Bandai Namco might have been to save time and to increase accessibility worldwide, this seems to be a backfiring strategy. According to the fans, the animation does not have the same power and crispness as the first season, in which each hit and frame was laden with power. The studio's intensive marketing and widespread licensing efforts have also been accused of overshadowing storytelling. Reports also note that, as promotional activities have been doing well, there may be no similar attention to quality control over production."It’s sad to see the lack of care from Bandai Namco after waiting 6 years for this anime Murata and ONE deserve better. OPM deserves way better. The fans deserve better." said a fan.Unlike the negativity of One-Punch Man Season 3, viewers tend to remember the adaptation of Madhouse to Season 1 as the golden standard of the franchise. That season featured flowing battle scenes, colorful direction, and a flawless mix of comedy and action. The stricter style of season 3 has left such quality many miles behind, creating comparisons that paint Bandai Namco as the beginning of creative decay. This is rather a symbolic view, but it conveys the wider discontentment with corporate meddling in key anime projects."One Of the Worst Production Committee. You better know J.C Staff can't animate OPM with there Busy schedule even you and Bandai Namco Choose the J.C Staff to Animate it. OPM Needs Madhouse and Singo Natsume. OPM Deserves Better." read a tweet.Garou (Image Credits: J.C.Staff)Finally, the impact of corporate decision-making on creative work is portrayed by One-Punch Man Season 3. This move, albeit financially prudent, has brought a lot of criticism to Bandai Namco because of the apparent loss of consistency of production. By late October 2025, conversations in social media, forums, and news media still position the company as the primary villain of the season. Not as something posing a threat in the in-world, but as an embodiment of a lack of artistic balance.To sum up, One-Punch Man Season 3 has turned into a lesson of what the viewers expect and what the production is responsible for. The further domination of the series by Bandai Namco has developed a feeling that financial gain has prevailed over the necessity of creative accuracy. Although there is still a chance to redeem the adaptation with better visuals and narration in the future episodes, the loss of audience trust is quite severe. One-Punch Man Season 3 will soon be recalled not so much as the sheer power of Saitama but as the controversies surrounding its bumpy comeback that remained unaddressed by anyone.